|
Cancer Risk Similar Across Transplant Drug Regimens
Reported May 01, 2010
Widely-used immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplant appear to carry
similar long-term cancer risks, Australian researchers found.
Skin cancer and other cancers did not occur any sooner whether patients got
azathioprine (Azasan, Imuran) and prednisolone or cyclosporine (Gengraf,
Neoral, Sandimmune) monotherapy or switched from cyclosporine to the other
regimen.
The lack of difference between treatments persisted in multivariate analysis
of the randomized trial with more than 20 years of follow-up, Martin P.
Gallagher, MD, of the George Institute for International Health in
Camperdown, Australia, and colleagues.
"The risk may be mediated by the total burden of immunosuppression more than
the agent," they wrote online in the Journal of the American Society of
Nephrology.
Much debate has centered on effects of the various agents and dose regimens,
with concerns raised about azathioprine and cyclosporine, among others,
Gallagher's group noted.
Even if there were small differences that the study wasn't powered to
detect, despite a median of 20.6 years of follow-up, the clinical
implications would be questionable "because most modern transplant regimens
use combinations of antiproliferative agents and calcineurin antagonists,"
they added.
The regimens used in the study reflected common practice over the past
decades, which differs from modern practice with new antiproliferative
agents and mandated cyclosporine drug monitoring, they cautioned.
But factors other than the specific immunosuppressive therapy contributed
much more to cancer risk after transplantation, the researchers showed.
In multivariate analyses, significant predictors of skin cancer were older
age, non-brown eye color, fairer skin, and a functioning transplant, which
together predicted 10- to 28-fold higher incidence over time.
Independent predictors of other cancer types in the kidney transplant
patients were older age and history of smoking, which combined to elevate
risk approximately six-fold over time.
The researchers analyzed long-term follow-up on 481 patients in the
Australian Multicenter Trial of Cyclosporine Withdrawal, which had
randomized patients to the following:
* Standard therapy of azathioprine and prednisolone.
* Long-term cyclosporine.
* Cyclosporine followed by withdrawal at three months followed by
maintenance azathioprine and prednisolone.
During follow-up, 46% of patients developed at least one cancer. For 19% it
was a non-skin cancer, while 35% had at least one skin cancer, excluding
melanoma.
Overall cumulative incidence of non-skin cancer at 20 years after transplant
was similar among the treatment regimens: 27% for both the azathioprine and
prednisolone and cyclosporine monotherapy groups and 28% for the switch
group (P=0.96).
Time-to-development of the first non-skin cancer likewise didn't differ
significantly, with a mean of 16.0 years, 15.3 years, and 15.7 years,
respectively.
For skin cancer, the cumulative incidence of skin cancer at 20 years again
did not differ among the three randomized treatment groups (50%, 48%, and
46%, respectively, P=0.69).
The mean time to the first non-melanoma skin cancer was similar at 13.6
years with azathioprine and prednisolone, 14.3 years with cyclosporine
alone, and 15.2 years with cyclosporine followed by azathioprine and
prednisolone.
Indeed, there is no compelling clinical evidence for one regimen over
another in the literature on post-transplant malignancy, Gallagher's group
concluded.
"Despite the existing knowledge regarding cancer risk, no immunosuppressive
treatment strategies have been proved to reduce this risk," they wrote in
the paper.
One recent study suggested a lower risk with sirolimus (Rapamune), but this
has not yet been validated by other studies or meta-analyses, they said.
The Australian Multicenter Trial of Cyclosporine Withdrawal included a
largely white population in Australia, which has among the world's highest
skin cancer rates.
"The absolute estimates of risk may differ for transplant recipients in
different settings, but it is likely that the relative differences will hold
true," the investigators suggested in the paper.
Source : MedPage Today |