Women who conceive using fertility treatment run a fourfold higher risk of a
stillbirth, warn researchers.
They found extra risk for women having in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared with women getting pregnant
naturally or using other treatments.
The study comes after a leading expert claimed Britain faces an infertility
timebomb because a generation of babies may have inherited their parents'
inability to conceive.
IVF pioneer Dr Andre van Steirteghem told a US conference that more than
260,000 children born from IVF treatments in the UK are at greater risk of
health problems.
In a new study from Denmark, specialists say a small extra risk of
stillbirth could be caused by the technology rather than fertility problems
being experienced by couples having treatment.
Dr Kirsten Wisborg, who led the study, said 'Until now, there has been
speculation that the increased risk of adverse outcomes, such as
stillbirths, in assisted reproduction might be due to factors related to the
underlying infertility of the couples.
'However, we found the risk was similar between sub-fertile couples, women
who had conceived after non-IVF fertility treatment and fertile couples.
'This may indicate that the increased risk of stillbirth is not explained by
infertility and may be due to other, as yet unexplained factors, such as the
technology involved in IVF/ICSI or some physiological difference in the
couples that require IVF/ICSI.
'It is important to remember that the risk of stillbirth is still very low
among women pregnant after IVF/ICSI' she added.
Dr Wisborg and colleagues at Aarhus University Hospital analysed data on
women booked for delivery between August 1989 and October 2006.
Out of a total of 20,166 singleton, first-time pregnancies, 16,525 (82 per
cent) were conceived spontaneously after less than 12 months, 2,020 (10 per
cent) after more than a year of trying (classified as sub-fertile), 879 (4
per cent) conceived after non-IVF fertility treatment and 742 (4 per cent)
conceived after IVF/ICSI.
There was a total of 86 stillbirths, giving an overall risk of stillbirth of
4.3 per thousand pregnancies, says the study published in the medical
journal Human Reproduction.
The risk of stillbirth in women who conceived after IVF/ICSI was 16.2 per
thousand.
However, Dr Karl Nygren, associate professor at the IVF and Fertility
Clinic, Sofiahammet Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, said his team had failed to
find such a risk in a similar study of more than 27,000 women having IVF.
He said 'We compared outcomes from pregnancies after IVF/ICSI with a control
group of 2,603,601 spontaneous pregnancies.
'We found no increase in stillbirths from IVF/ICSI treatment in this larger
group, and this contrasts with the Danish study that found a four-fold
increase in the risk of stillbirths between the IVF/ICSI pregnancies and
spontaneous pregnancies.
'I don't know why the two studies should have such different findings, but
couples should be reassured that the risk of stillbirths is low.
'One thing is for certain: a singleton pregnancy is much safer than a
multiple pregnancy, and this is what we should all be striving to achieve
every time we treat a woman.'
In a separate study, Swedish researchers found non-identical twins conceived
through IVF faced a higher rate of complications including premature birth,
jaundice and respiratory problems compared with naturally occurring twins.
The study in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
(must credit) looked at 1,545 pairs of different-sex twins born after IVF
and compared outcomes with 8,675 pairs born after natural conception.
Mrs Alison McTavish, secretary of the British Fertility Society, said 'It is
important to emphasise that this study shows the risk of stillbirth after
assisted fertility treatment is still extremely low and the majority of
people who have a baby following IVF/ICSI treatment have a healthy baby.
'The paper states that we still do not know the causes of stillbirth and, in
spite of having a good number of cases in the study, this question has not
been answered.'
Source : www.dailymail.co.uk