|
Does Early Bone Loss Mean You
Need Drugs?
Reported January 30, 2008
Your doctor breaks the news that you've got osteopenia, an early
state of bone loss that is often a precursor to osteoporosis.
She's advising osteoporosis drugs. Should you take them?
It's a question that a huge swath of American women may at some
point face, since some 40 percent of those who've passed
menopause have osteopenia, according to a 2001 study published
in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Rheumatologists, endocrinologists, gynecologists, internists,
geriatricians, and family practice doctors all diagnose and
treat it—and, in the absence of clear guidelines, their
approaches vary. Some more aggressive clinicians recommend
medications early to head off worsening bone loss; others take a
wait-and-see attitude, with suggestions for regular exercise and
plenty of calcium through diet and supplements, if needed.
Now, a new analysis by researchers in Spain, Canada, and
Australia suggests that more women than really need to may be
taking drugs. Noting that most osteopenia studies have focused
on preventing a single vertebral fracture—when two thirds of
vertebral fractures are asymptomatic, and long-bone and hip
fractures are much more of a concern—the researchers raise the
possibility that overzealous drug marketing may result in too
much treatment.
The medical community doesn't consider osteopenia a disease;
rather, it's a marker for risk of fractures. But degree of risk
is a tough call in the early stages of bone loss. What's needed,
experts say, is advice from the World Health Organization. The
group is currently developing guidance to help clinicians advise
patients with osteopenia on when drugs may be appropriate. At
the moment, "it's entirely possible that we are actually
overtreating this condition, but we may also be undertreating
it," says Neil Gonter, assistant professor of clinical medicine
at Columbia University and a rheumatologist in private practice
in New Jersey. Drug options include bisphosphonates such as
Fosamax, Boniva, and Actonel; calcitonins such as Fortical and
Miacalcin; estrogen and hormone therapy; Forteo (a parathyroid
hormone); raloxifene; or combination therapy.
Typically, doctors are apt to look for other risk factors before
prescribing drugs, noted lead author Pablo Alonso-Coello, a
family practitioner in Spain, in an E-mail interview. These
include age, a tendency to fall, poor eyesight, smoking,
drinking more than two drinks per day, low body weight, previous
fractures, existing spine fracture, and history of parental hip
fracture. Some medications, such as corticosteroids and
aromatase inhibitors (for breast cancer) may cause bone loss,
too. And conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes,
Parkinson's disease, and stroke also heighten the risk. But what
remains unclear, according to the analysis, published this month
in the journal BMJ, is what level of fracture risk warrants
aggressive treatment. Drug marketing since the mid-1990s has
urged medication use in younger postmenopausal women at
"relatively low risk of fracture," the analysis says. It adds
that such messages tied to osteopenia "warrant skepticism."
Bone loss is indeed a serious issue, with aggressive treatment
necessary in many cases. But "the big problem is people with
true osteoporosis aren't getting treated," says Robert P.
Heaney, a Creighton University professor and member of the
National Osteoporosis Foundation's Emeritus Board. Someone with
osteoporosis can break a bone even without obvious trauma,
according to the NOF's treatment guidelines.
Young, healthy women who have been told they have osteopenia
should certainly consider possible side effects before turning
to drugs. The bisphosphonates can cause gastrointestinal
illness, and some women taking raloxifene are at an increased
risk of stroke. In Alonso-Coello's opinion, unless you have
several risk factors and are older than 65 or 70, the best
course of action is a healthy lifestyle that includes exercise,
no smoking, and a balanced diet.
|