Dramatic changes in working patterns have taken place in the UK,
particularly in the rise of women in employment. Three quarters of households
now have dual incomes, but women still take responsibility for most of the
housework, according to research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.
Despite institutional and legislative changes intended to reduce inequality
and improve work-life balance, women are still finding themselves working long
hours at home and at work and, for their trouble, generally receive less pay
than their male equivalents. The project, carried out by Dr Susan Harkness in
the Department of Economics at Bristol University, studied the changes in female employment
in the UK since the 1970s, a field that has seen little previous research. It
focused on: working hours; times of work; income and wage premiums; and unpaid
work such as, housework and childcare.
As improved wage opportunities for women have emerged in recent decades, more
and more married women have taken up paid employment. In 2002, 70 per cent of
working age women who were in employment, a rise of 10 per cent since 1979 and,
over the same period, employment rates for mothers with pre-school children
almost doubled. In contrast, the number of men in employment and the hours that
they work has fallen.
“Despite recent progress, there remain employment inequalities between men
and women. For example, less qualified women don’t earn as much and are less
likely to work full time than comparably qualified men,” said Susan
Harkness.
Dr Susan Harkness“However, the pay gap is much narrower between men and women
with degrees and there is some good news for less skilled women. They’ve seen
the largest improvement in their relative labour market position, but it’s still
women who’re doing most of the housework, regardless of qualifications.”
Despite men apparently working less, it is predominantly women who take time
off to look after sick children, including 60 per cent of women who earn the
same or more then their partners. Working mothers with children put twice as
many hours into housework as their partners despite the possibility of ‘role
reversal’ in earnings. Housework is more evenly split in dual income households,
especially when women earn as much or more than their partners and have no
children. Of course, more affluent couples are able to afford to reduce their
domestic burdens through hired help and by acquiring labour saving devices.
The pressures are really on for mothers working full time in dual earner
couples and for single parents who work full time. Both long working hours, the
burden of unpaid housework and childcare responsibilities have increased the
time pressures for many women. The constraints that these pressures put on the
energies of working women, particularly mothers, is seen to be holding back
their earning power. Being on the run with work and family commitments provides
little opportunity to concentrate on the actions necessary for career
progression.
“Some of the newly introduced policies aimed at improving work-life balance,
such as paternity leave, will help redress current imbalances,” said Susan
Harkness. “But others, like the new rights of full time carers to request
flexible working conditions, are likely, in my view, to reinforce current gender
divisions in housework - because carers are usually women.”
Much has been said and written about work-life balance and this research adds
further evidence for this debate. Some of Europe’s longest hours at work for
parents in full time employment, and housework and childcare responsibilities
taken on by working mothers has lead to increased time pressures for many
people. Breaking this cycle cannot be achieved by legislation alone and may
require a complete cultural re-think.
The research report Employment, Work Patterns and Unpaid Work: An Analysis of
Trends Since the 1970s was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
(ESRC).
http://www.bris.ac.uk/