Wife of ambassador to Japan
asks ag secretary to allow mad cow tests
April 15, 2004
Former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker, wife of the U.S. ambassador to Japan, is
asking the Agriculture Department to reconsider its refusal to let American
meatpackers do their own tests for mad cow disease.
Such testing could promote confidence in U.S. beef and help re-establish
exports to countries that ban it now, Baker said in a letter to Agriculture
Secretary Ann Veneman.
"At this time in our critical export markets we need to get behind all the
best marketing tools we can," said Baker, wife of Ambassador Howard Baker.
He, too, is a former senator.
Japan is one of more than 50 countries with beef import bans in effect. But
Baker said she was not writing as a representative of the U.S. Embassy in
Tokyo or in any other official capacity. The Kansas Republican said she was
stating her opinion as a private cow-calf producer.
Baker noted that the department had rejected a proposal by a small
meatpacker, Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, to let the company test cattle
slaughtered at its plant in Kansas.
"I've come to strongly believe that the time has come for USDA to reconsider
the decision made to reject 100 percent testing by meatpackers such as
Creekstone Farms," she wrote.
The letter was released Thursday by Creekstone Farms. Its contents were
confirmed by Baker's son, Bill Kassebaum. Agriculture Department spokesman
Ed Loyd said the department had not yet received the letter.
Creekstone Farms has said Japanese buyers were willing to accept its beef if
the company tested every animal and had Agriculture Department
certification. In rejecting the request for a license, the department said
there is no scientific reason to test every animal. The department, which
controls the rights to do the tests, has been approving
university-affiliated labs to help it test 220,000 cattle or more nationwide
by the end of 2005.
Baker said private testing of all animals at a producer's facility would not
hurt U.S. consumer confidence, and could help sell beef. "If it is only a
`marketing tool' as has been implied, then I would say, `why not?"' she
wrote.
The Agriculture Department would consider Baker's comments as it considers
others, spokesman Loyd said. "We always welcome comment and input from our
constituencies," he said.