Think lung cancer, and most people picture a disease that
primarily strikes older men who smoke.
What many don't realize is that lung cancer accounts for
25% of all cancer deaths involving women. And women may be more susceptible to
the disease than men, research suggests, a fact many women — and their doctors —
may not realize.
"Lung cancer causes more deaths among women than breast,
uterine and ovarian cancers combined, but I don't think this is on women's radar
screens at all," said Dr. Jyoti Patel, an oncologist at Northwestern Memorial
Hospital in Chicago, and a specialist in women's lung cancer.
"Women who smoked when they were young, stopped 30 years
ago and did all the right things since are underestimating their risk for lung
cancer," added Patel, who co-authored an April 2004 report in the Journal of the
American Medical Association on the risks of lung cancer in women.
That lack of awareness is often compounded by ill-informed
doctors, she said.
"When I was in medical school, we were taught that lung
cancer is a disease for men 60 years and older who smoke, and most interns today
still think that is typical," Patel said. The result: Many doctors don't talk to
their female patients about the risks of lung cancer.
But the facts are quite different. Nearly one in four
cancer deaths among women in 2003 was due to lung cancer. An estimated 70,000
women died from lung cancer in the United States, compared to approximately
39,000 women who died from breast cancer, according to the American Cancer
Society.
There are myriad reasons for both the prevalence of lung
cancer among women and the high death rate from the disease, health
professionals said.
The main culprit, predictably, is smoking.
"If you ask me for the top 10 causes for lung cancer, I'd
say nine of them are smoking," said Patel.
Nearly one out of five women smoke, and many more are
former smokers, she noted.
"The risk of developing lung cancer remains for 20 years
after quitting, and then the risk drops by half," said Viviana Simon, director
of scientific affairs for the Society for Women's Health Research, in
Washington, D.C.
But for women, there are other factors linked to the
disease that are gender-based, she said.
Non-smoking women are more likely to get lung cancer than
non-smoking men, Simon said. More women than men develop small-cell lung cancer,
which is more aggressive than other lung cancers and harder to cure. There is
some evidence that men's and women's hormonal differences could affect the
course of the disease. And women, no matter what stage of lung cancer they have,
live longer than men at the same stage of disease, she said.
Yet there's little research into why these gender
differences exist and what they could mean for treatment of the disease.
"There has to be more awareness in the scientific
community, the clinical community and the public about the dangers of lung
cancer and the differences in prevalence and risk for women and men," Simon
said.
Research into lung cancer is negligible compared to other
cancers, Patel said, with only $1,300 spent on research per patient death from
lung cancer. This compares to $30,000 per patient with HIV, $18,000 per breast
cancer patient, and $10,000 per prostate cancer patient, she said.
This is partly because there are fewer survivors of lung
cancer to lobby for a cure for the disease. But there's also a cultural bias
against lung cancer patients who smoke — that they brought the disease on
themselves, Patel said, adding women tend to be particularly susceptible to this
line of thought.
"Women who have smoked marginalize themselves," Patel said.
This sense of guilt often leads them to be lax about their health care, and to
think they're getting what they deserve.
"I say to my patients that they made one bad choice, but I
don't think anyone would say that one bad choice means they deserve cancer," she
said.
Both Patel and Simon said more research is needed if lung
cancer deaths are to be reduced. Presently, there are few reliable screening
techniques for early detection. And while there are some promising new drugs to
treat the disease — Iressa and Tarceva are two that are effective, especially
for women — more science needs to be applied to the task of a cure, Patel
said.
In the meantime, Patel recommends that women become more
proactive about their risk for lung cancer, even if they don't smoke or have
never smoked.
"If women feel a lump in their breast, they go to the
doctor quickly," she said, and the same sound approach should apply to lung
cancer risk.
Patel recommends paying attention to a cough. Coughs can
signal lots of problems, from post nasal drip to a cold. But a cough that
"changes character" in any way, in frequency or severity, means you should see a
doctor. Similarly if you have shortness of breath, are awakened at night by
coughing or have blood in your sputum, you should see a doctor and tell him
about your concerns, she said.