(Ivanhoe Newswire) -- Racial differences may play a role in determining a
patient's response to asthma medications.
In a new study, blacks who were asthmatic and nonasthmatic required higher
doses of glucocorticoids, or controller medications, to reduce airway
inflammation. Because of this, blacks may be more likely to have a reduced
medication response, and therefore,their asthma symptoms may be more difficult
to control.
The study also shows age was the only other significant variable that
affected glucocorticoid response. Even in healthy populations without disease or
inflammation, response to steroids changed over time.
Researchers from the National Jewish Medical and Research Center and the
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center evaluated whether blacks have a
racial disposition to a diminished response to a glucocorticoid. Researchers
preformed blood tests on 395 patients with asthma and 202 patients without
asthma.
When both black and white patients with asthma who had a similar degree of
airflow limitation and comparable controller medication requirements were
tested, African-American patients required grater concentration of the
glucocorticoid medication to suppress airway inflammation. This difference in
response between blacks and whites was also present in patients without
asthma.
"Regardless of asthma status or severity, African-Americans in our study
required higher doses of a glucocorticoid than Caucasians to inhibit
proliferation of these inflammatory cells", says Ronina Covar, M.D. "This
observation suggests that African-Americans may have an inherent predisposition
that affects their ability to respond to certain medications at recommended
doses."
"These patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled on usual medication
doses may benefit from a higher dose or the addition of other controller
medications." A higher dose isn't necessarily needed for other ailments, such as
rheumatologic and gastrointestinal problems, that are also treated with the
glucocorticoid medication.
SOURCE: Neurology, 2005;571-578